Supplying Volatility - The Week Ahead
- Courriel
-
Signet
-
Imprimer
Disponible en anglais seulement
Ian Lyngen, Ben Jeffery, and Vail Hartman bring you their thoughts on the U.S. Rates market for the upcoming week of May 8th, 2023, and respond to questions submitted by listeners and clients.
Follow us on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Stitcher and Spotify or your preferred podcast provider.
About Macro Horizons
BMO's Fixed Income, Currencies, and Commodities (FICC) Macro Strategy group and other special guests provide weekly and monthly updates on the FICC markets through three Macro Horizons channels; US Rates - The Week Ahead, Monthly Roundtable and High Quality Credit Spreads.
Ian Lyngen:
This is Macro Horizons' episode 221, Supplying Volatility, presented by BMO Capital Markets. I'm your host, Ian Lyngen here with Ben Jeffery and Vail Hartman to bring you our thoughts from the trading desk for the upcoming week of May 8th. Ahead of the refunding auctions, we are reminded that while there's no such thing as a bad bond, a bad price by any other name causes just as much pain.
Each week we offer an updated view on the U.S. Rates market and a bad joke or two, but more importantly, the show is centered on responding directly to questions submitted by listeners and clients. We also end each show with our musings on the week ahead. Please feel free to reach out on Bloomberg or email me at ian.lyngen@bmo.com with questions for future episodes. We value your input and hope to keep the show as interactive as possible. So that being said, let's get started.
In the week just passed, the Treasury market received a variety of meaningful, high-level fundamental and monetary policy inputs to help define the trading direction. The first and perhaps most fundamental was in the form of a 25 basis point rate hike from the Fed, and this was accompanied by changes to the statement that imply that even if this is not the final rate hike of the cycle, there are not that many more opportunities on the horizon for the Fed to move rates higher. Specifically, the removal of the language focused on future rate hikes has opened the door for the Fed not to hike in June.
Now, obviously, this will be a function of how the economic data plays out in the interim and whether or not the committee is actually convinced that policy is in restrictive territory. Now, April's stronger-than-expected payrolls report suggests that if the Fed is restrictive, that the lagged impact of that is taking longer than one might traditionally expect. It's also worth highlighting that in addition to the higher than expected NFP print, the unemployment rate decreased to 3.4%, which is the cycle low, and that occurred in a month where the labor force participation rate was unchanged, which makes the improvement in the unemployment rate all that much stronger. In addition, average hourly earnings, which were seen increasing three tenths of a percent month over month surprised on the upside printing at five tenths of a percent, which led to an increase in the year-over-year pace of average hourly earnings to 4.4%.
This feeds into market participants' concerns about a wage inflation spiral and if anything would serve to push back against any expectations that the regional banking crisis would lead the Fed to cut rates in June. Before Non-Farm Payrolls, there was roughly a 10% probability of a June rate cut priced into the market, and unsurprisingly, since the employment update, that probability has been reduced markedly. We also received the refunding announcement, which showed as expected auction sizes were unchanged with 40 billion 3s, 35 billion 10s, and 21 billion bonds.
Now, perhaps more importantly within the announcement the Treasury Department laid out its plan to follow through with conversations surrounding buybacks, but those buybacks are not slated to begin until 2024. That will give the market more than sufficient time to anticipate and accommodate what the Treasury Department hopes will be a liquidity-enhancing event, at least for on-the-run securities. Now, issuing more on-the-runs to buy off-the-runs, which is in effect what the Treasury Department is doing won't help the off-the-runs. If for no other reason than it will take off-the-runs out of the market completely, then they won't be held by private market participants or by the Fed and be available for repo, which in practical terms creates a disincentive for market makers to sell those securities if they know they're going to struggle to purchase or find them in the secondary market.
Vail Hartman:
From what we thought would be a week of price action driven by the slate of economic data ended up being largely driven by headlines out of the regional banking sector. We saw the VIX spike to its highest level since the end of March, and regional bank stocks came under significant pressure as the financial crisis might not yet be over.
Ian Lyngen:
Well, Vail, you make a very good point. The primary drivers in the U.S. Rates market over the course of the last week shifted back to the regional banking saga. Now, obviously, given the resurgence of this concern, the reality is that it's going to be quite some time before investors are comfortable putting this episode behind us. More importantly, the developments occurred as the Fed delivered what is largely considered to be its final rate hike for the cycle, bringing the upper bound to 5.25. With an effective Fed Funds of 5.1, this creates a much deeper inversion of funds versus 2s and funds versus 10s. The reason I highlight this is because there's an assumption in the market that 2s can't trade deeply below Fed Funds unless the Fed is near a rate cut. That being said, the stronger-than-expected payrolls print takes the risk of a near-term rate cut off the table for the time being and frankly reinforces the notion that the Treasury market is going to remain in a lower rate environment with 10-year yields now comfortably below 3.50 for the bulk of the week.
Ben Jeffery:
And within Powell's press conference, we did hear the chair sound relatively optimistic on the state of the banking system and the effectiveness of the discount window in the Bank Term Funding Program to continue functioning as an emergency source of funding for banks who need it. But the fact that the day after the Fed, the concerns that you highlighted Vail led to the market pricing in nearly 10 basis points of rate cuts at the June meeting clearly suggests that while the Fed may be confident that the crisis will be contained and that policy can now stay at terminal for an extended period of time, the market is not so convinced. And within the language of the policy statement we got on Wednesday, we also saw the committee change their characterization of future tightening moves from maybe being appropriate to now a function of the incoming data. We've got yet another stronger-than-expected employment report, both in terms of headline NFP and the unemployment rate, caveated by downward revisions, and that's going to leave the next pivotal macro point Wednesday's inflation update.
Ian Lyngen:
Let us not forget, however, that there is going to be a tightening impulse for overall financial conditions associated with the spike in equity vol that Vail pointed out earlier. So this suggests that we actually could find ourselves in a situation that despite stronger payrolls data and an as expected or even incrementally firmer inflation report, the Fed chooses to stick with the messaging that it will take several months before Powell is convinced in either direction whether or not the Fed is truly in restrictive territory. This brings us to a question that we received this week from a particularly insightful client, and that was: What's more likely, the FDIC increases the insured maximum deposit to something above $250,000 or the Fed cuts rates both presumably as a result of the banking crisis?
Ben Jeffery:
At a first pass, I would say FDIC increase may be more likely.
Ian Lyngen:
So you clearly haven't been following what's been going on in Congress. We're worried about Congress not dealing with a debt ceiling in a timely of enough manner to avoid a default by the U.S. Government. The notion that Congress could muster the needed support to shift the FDIC's deposit limit higher is really difficult for me at least to get my arms around, particularly at this point when contagion appears to be relatively contained. I'll suggests that to get to the needed stage of urgency on the part of lawmakers to actually push through an FDIC increase in the insured deposit amount, that overall financial conditions would've needed to tighten so far beyond the Fed's comfort level that if nothing else a rate cut might be equally as likely as the FDIC being allowed to increase its limit.
Ben Jeffery:
And along with that line of thinking is an idea that the three of us have discussed, which is the unknowable uncertainty of how many rate hikes is a regional banking crisis worth. And along with CPI and the refunding auctions next week, we also get to see the Senior Loan Officer Survey that is released on Monday.
Ian Lyngen:
To you two, everyone is a senior citizen.
Ben Jeffery:
But in all seriousness, the Senior Loan Officer Survey is one of the benchmark quantitative measures we're going to get in terms of how lenders around the country are pulling back on credit at a time when firms arguably are going to need increased access to capital given the state of the overall economic outlook.
Ian Lyngen:
It's also notable that the recent re-escalation of tensions in the banking sector put Monday's report in a very particular context, i.e., if we don't see credit standards being reflected as tighter, the market will simply look at that information as dated because it doesn't have the most recent leg of the saga. On the flip side, if loan officers indicate a great deal of tightening, the market will similarly say, "Well, that doesn't fully reflect what has happened and presumably what will happen over the course of the next couple of months."
Ben Jeffery:
And we had several discussions around this issue with a variety of types of clients this week, and the very good point was made around the role that regional banks play in terms of the overall lending landscape. Specifically given what might be ongoing consolidation in the financial space, that the variety of loans that regional banks give to presumably smaller local businesses may not carry over on a one-for-one basis to larger financial institutions.
Vail Hartman:
But a serious question, if you have your money at a smaller bank, why not move it to a larger one?
Ian Lyngen:
That's actually a very interesting notion and to some extent, we have seen outflows from small and regional banks into the big money center institutions. However, and as Ben pointed out, access to funding for small and medium-sized firms is a key service that is provided by the regional banks. And for all intents and purposes, it's the relationships between the small banks and the end user that have resulted in at least some of the deposits being comparatively sticky. Certainly, there's more loyalty on the part of depositors at small banks than there might be between large institutions, if that makes sense.
Ben Jeffery:
So this line of thinking should theoretically put a floor under the scale of deposit flight we'll see from smaller banks, but through a longer term and more macro lens, that's not going to prevent credit tightening from flowing through to actual business activity in terms of hiring plans. And it's that delayed flow through to ultimately the lagging indicator of the jobs market that's going to ultimately inspire a more dovish tone shift from the Fed. Although clearly in April with a 3.4% unemployment rate and an unchanged labor force participation rate that didn't happen last month.
Ian Lyngen:
We also haven't addressed the portfolio side of the regional banking sector. We know that even if it is in the held-to-maturity accounts, the sharp spike in interest rates over the course of the last 8 to 12 months has served to undermine some of the key assets. And frankly, that's why the banking sector finds itself in its current situation. Now, this isn't to suggest the global monetary policymakers are to blame, but rather it's simply a side effect of what the Fed has attempted to accomplish over the course of the last year and a half.
Vail Hartman:
So we've talked about the Fed and NFP and we also got the quarterly refunding announcement and what we're expecting will be the final unchanged coupon auction sizes.
Ben Jeffery:
You're exactly right, Vail. Wednesday morning we learned that next week's refunding auctions are going to be 35 billion 10s, 21 billion 30s, and 40 billion 3s to kick off May's coupon supply on Tuesday. But what investors were more focused on going into the release was any additional information that the Treasury Department was willing to give on the issue of Treasury buybacks, both for cash management purposes but also for liquidity support in the longer end of the curve. And what we saw was somewhat surprising on two fronts. First, we did get a fair amount of information on what it is the buyback program is actually going to look like. That was a surprise simply given the fact that the Treasury acknowledged they're going to need to continue to study this topic and get feedback from market participants, and then on the other side was the timing. While there were some that were expecting the program would be implemented as soon as August, what we actually learned is that we're going to need to wait until early next year until the initially relatively modest-size buyback program gets underway.
In terms of mechanics and size, what we saw was that for the Liquidity Support Program, the Treasury is endeavoring to purchase up to between 5 and $10 billion a month in maturities greater than one year, that will be spread in a distribution across the curve reflective of the current maturity profile of debt outstanding, similar to what we saw take place during QE. In terms of the cadence of the buying, somewhere between six and eight operations per quarter was suggested as a way to deliver one or two operations in each maturity bucket with the size and timing of the operations likely announced once a quarter, presumably at subsequent refunding announcements. So February, May, August, and November.
Ian Lyngen:
This actually brings us to a couple of issues as it relates to the Treasury Department's new buyback program. The first being how much will actually be utilized. Will we get to that 10 billion a month number and stay there or as we suspect, utilization will be high in the very beginning and as the program runs its course and continues to be a background factor, participation will slowly decline as the market re-prices to the reality of the Treasury's buyback program being in place for an extended period of time?
The second observation that we'd like to make is that the timing of the implementation of the program was very strategic. The Treasury Department is currently dealing with the debt ceiling issue, which means for all intents and purposes, the rundown of the TGA is creating a QE impulse at the moment where the Fed is actively engaged in QT. Fast-forward to the beginning of 2024, presumably the debt ceiling will be resolved and the QT that had been held at bay will be far more tangible in the real economy. And while the Fed's buybacks are neither QT nor QE, the reality is the net effect of the liquidity-enhancing effort will be a government buyer in the Treasury market. Which brings me to a question for you Vail. What is the difference between a bond and a bond trader?
Vail Hartman:
I don't know.
Ian Lyngen:
Bonds mature.
In the week ahead, U.S. Rates will be influenced by supply, inflation, inflation expectations, and of course any developments in the regional banking saga. Up first will be the 3-year auction of 40 billion on Tuesday, followed by 10s on Wednesday, and capped by 21 billion 30-years on Thursday. On Wednesday morning, the April CPI print is expected to come in at four tenths of a percent month over month with the core numbers at three tenths of a percent month over month. Given the recent volatility and some of the fluctuations within the used auto prices as well as the stickiness of OER and rent, despite the March numbers, there appears to be a modest bias toward an upside surprise within that series. It also warrants a nod to the fact that average hourly earnings in April did increase more than expected, about half a percent. And the correlation between average hourly earnings and core services ex-shelter is very high and represents the most direct pass-through that could lead to a wage inflation spiral of the type that the Fed has tried very hard to push back against over the course of this cycle.
Let us not forget that on Friday we get the University of Michigan's survey and this information is for May and contains the forward-looking inflation expectations number. Recall that the most recent print showed an upside surprise in one-year inflation expectations. Keep in mind that there's a high correlation between gasoline prices and short-term inflation expectations. So given some of the moves that we have seen in the energy sector, that shift was not particularly surprising. More importantly, the 5 to 10-year expectations remain at 2.9%, that's elevated by pre-pandemic standards and as a result, will remain an ongoing concern for monetary policymakers. While we are not expecting a near-term retracement of inflation back to the levels that the Fed would view as consistent with their longer-term objective, eventually the year-over-year base effects combined with a moderation in that monthly gains will lead the Fed to a position in which it chooses to emphasize forward-looking inflation expectations over the realized data in the event that the realized data finally conforms with a 2% inflation target.
The regional banking issues and concerns that the contagion could spread further have and will probably continue to influence the Treasury market and keep rates lower than they might have otherwise been. 3.65 in 2-year yields prove to be a good selling opportunity. And in the event of a retest of that range, we would similarly expect a bounce in front end nominal rates as such pricing implies a near-term Fed cut that we struggle to imagine comes to fruition. Looking further out the curve, we continue to view 3.50 in 10-year yields as an important focal point. And while we might see 10-year rates drift above 3.50 as indicated by the technical profile at the moment, anything above that 3.60 to 3.65 zone would represent a solid buying opportunity given the mounting array of global economic headwinds.
We've reached the point in this week's episode where we'd like to offer our sincere thanks and condolences to anyone who has managed to make it this far. And as we break down the details of the employment report, we'll note that April represented the 13th consecutive upside surprise. Not so unlucky after all, unless you were long Treasuries.
Thanks for listening to Macro Horizons. Please visit us at bmocm.com\macrohorizons. As we aspire to keep our strategy effort as interactive as possible, we'd love to hear what you thought of today's episode, so please email me directly with any feedback at Ian.Lyngen@bmo.com. You can listen to this show and subscribe on Apple Podcasts or your favorite podcast provider. This show and resources are supported by our team here at BMO, including the FICC Macro Strategy Group and BMO's marketing team. This show has been produced and edited by Puddle Creative.
Speaker 4:
The views expressed here are those of the participants and not those of BMO Capital Markets, its affiliates, or subsidiaries. For full legal disclosure, visit bmocm.com/macrohorizons/legal.
Supplying Volatility - The Week Ahead
Directeur général et chef, Stratégie de taux des titres en dollars US
Ian Lyngen est directeur général et chef, Stratégie de taux des titres en dollars US au sein de l’équipe Stratégie de titre…
Spécialiste en stratégie, taux américains, titres à revenu fixe
Ben Jeffery est spécialiste en stratégie au sein de l’équipe responsable de la stratégie sur les taux américains de BM…
Analyst, U.S. Rates Strategy
Vail Hartman is an analyst on the U.S. Rates Strategy team at BMO Capital Markets. His primary focus is the U.S. Treasury market with specific interests in Federal …
Ian Lyngen est directeur général et chef, Stratégie de taux des titres en dollars US au sein de l’équipe Stratégie de titre…
VOIR LE PROFIL COMPLETBen Jeffery est spécialiste en stratégie au sein de l’équipe responsable de la stratégie sur les taux américains de BM…
VOIR LE PROFIL COMPLETVail Hartman is an analyst on the U.S. Rates Strategy team at BMO Capital Markets. His primary focus is the U.S. Treasury market with specific interests in Federal …
VOIR LE PROFIL COMPLET- Temps de lecture
- Écouter Arrêter
- Agrandir | Réduire le texte
Disponible en anglais seulement
Ian Lyngen, Ben Jeffery, and Vail Hartman bring you their thoughts on the U.S. Rates market for the upcoming week of May 8th, 2023, and respond to questions submitted by listeners and clients.
Follow us on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Stitcher and Spotify or your preferred podcast provider.
About Macro Horizons
BMO's Fixed Income, Currencies, and Commodities (FICC) Macro Strategy group and other special guests provide weekly and monthly updates on the FICC markets through three Macro Horizons channels; US Rates - The Week Ahead, Monthly Roundtable and High Quality Credit Spreads.
Ian Lyngen:
This is Macro Horizons' episode 221, Supplying Volatility, presented by BMO Capital Markets. I'm your host, Ian Lyngen here with Ben Jeffery and Vail Hartman to bring you our thoughts from the trading desk for the upcoming week of May 8th. Ahead of the refunding auctions, we are reminded that while there's no such thing as a bad bond, a bad price by any other name causes just as much pain.
Each week we offer an updated view on the U.S. Rates market and a bad joke or two, but more importantly, the show is centered on responding directly to questions submitted by listeners and clients. We also end each show with our musings on the week ahead. Please feel free to reach out on Bloomberg or email me at ian.lyngen@bmo.com with questions for future episodes. We value your input and hope to keep the show as interactive as possible. So that being said, let's get started.
In the week just passed, the Treasury market received a variety of meaningful, high-level fundamental and monetary policy inputs to help define the trading direction. The first and perhaps most fundamental was in the form of a 25 basis point rate hike from the Fed, and this was accompanied by changes to the statement that imply that even if this is not the final rate hike of the cycle, there are not that many more opportunities on the horizon for the Fed to move rates higher. Specifically, the removal of the language focused on future rate hikes has opened the door for the Fed not to hike in June.
Now, obviously, this will be a function of how the economic data plays out in the interim and whether or not the committee is actually convinced that policy is in restrictive territory. Now, April's stronger-than-expected payrolls report suggests that if the Fed is restrictive, that the lagged impact of that is taking longer than one might traditionally expect. It's also worth highlighting that in addition to the higher than expected NFP print, the unemployment rate decreased to 3.4%, which is the cycle low, and that occurred in a month where the labor force participation rate was unchanged, which makes the improvement in the unemployment rate all that much stronger. In addition, average hourly earnings, which were seen increasing three tenths of a percent month over month surprised on the upside printing at five tenths of a percent, which led to an increase in the year-over-year pace of average hourly earnings to 4.4%.
This feeds into market participants' concerns about a wage inflation spiral and if anything would serve to push back against any expectations that the regional banking crisis would lead the Fed to cut rates in June. Before Non-Farm Payrolls, there was roughly a 10% probability of a June rate cut priced into the market, and unsurprisingly, since the employment update, that probability has been reduced markedly. We also received the refunding announcement, which showed as expected auction sizes were unchanged with 40 billion 3s, 35 billion 10s, and 21 billion bonds.
Now, perhaps more importantly within the announcement the Treasury Department laid out its plan to follow through with conversations surrounding buybacks, but those buybacks are not slated to begin until 2024. That will give the market more than sufficient time to anticipate and accommodate what the Treasury Department hopes will be a liquidity-enhancing event, at least for on-the-run securities. Now, issuing more on-the-runs to buy off-the-runs, which is in effect what the Treasury Department is doing won't help the off-the-runs. If for no other reason than it will take off-the-runs out of the market completely, then they won't be held by private market participants or by the Fed and be available for repo, which in practical terms creates a disincentive for market makers to sell those securities if they know they're going to struggle to purchase or find them in the secondary market.
Vail Hartman:
From what we thought would be a week of price action driven by the slate of economic data ended up being largely driven by headlines out of the regional banking sector. We saw the VIX spike to its highest level since the end of March, and regional bank stocks came under significant pressure as the financial crisis might not yet be over.
Ian Lyngen:
Well, Vail, you make a very good point. The primary drivers in the U.S. Rates market over the course of the last week shifted back to the regional banking saga. Now, obviously, given the resurgence of this concern, the reality is that it's going to be quite some time before investors are comfortable putting this episode behind us. More importantly, the developments occurred as the Fed delivered what is largely considered to be its final rate hike for the cycle, bringing the upper bound to 5.25. With an effective Fed Funds of 5.1, this creates a much deeper inversion of funds versus 2s and funds versus 10s. The reason I highlight this is because there's an assumption in the market that 2s can't trade deeply below Fed Funds unless the Fed is near a rate cut. That being said, the stronger-than-expected payrolls print takes the risk of a near-term rate cut off the table for the time being and frankly reinforces the notion that the Treasury market is going to remain in a lower rate environment with 10-year yields now comfortably below 3.50 for the bulk of the week.
Ben Jeffery:
And within Powell's press conference, we did hear the chair sound relatively optimistic on the state of the banking system and the effectiveness of the discount window in the Bank Term Funding Program to continue functioning as an emergency source of funding for banks who need it. But the fact that the day after the Fed, the concerns that you highlighted Vail led to the market pricing in nearly 10 basis points of rate cuts at the June meeting clearly suggests that while the Fed may be confident that the crisis will be contained and that policy can now stay at terminal for an extended period of time, the market is not so convinced. And within the language of the policy statement we got on Wednesday, we also saw the committee change their characterization of future tightening moves from maybe being appropriate to now a function of the incoming data. We've got yet another stronger-than-expected employment report, both in terms of headline NFP and the unemployment rate, caveated by downward revisions, and that's going to leave the next pivotal macro point Wednesday's inflation update.
Ian Lyngen:
Let us not forget, however, that there is going to be a tightening impulse for overall financial conditions associated with the spike in equity vol that Vail pointed out earlier. So this suggests that we actually could find ourselves in a situation that despite stronger payrolls data and an as expected or even incrementally firmer inflation report, the Fed chooses to stick with the messaging that it will take several months before Powell is convinced in either direction whether or not the Fed is truly in restrictive territory. This brings us to a question that we received this week from a particularly insightful client, and that was: What's more likely, the FDIC increases the insured maximum deposit to something above $250,000 or the Fed cuts rates both presumably as a result of the banking crisis?
Ben Jeffery:
At a first pass, I would say FDIC increase may be more likely.
Ian Lyngen:
So you clearly haven't been following what's been going on in Congress. We're worried about Congress not dealing with a debt ceiling in a timely of enough manner to avoid a default by the U.S. Government. The notion that Congress could muster the needed support to shift the FDIC's deposit limit higher is really difficult for me at least to get my arms around, particularly at this point when contagion appears to be relatively contained. I'll suggests that to get to the needed stage of urgency on the part of lawmakers to actually push through an FDIC increase in the insured deposit amount, that overall financial conditions would've needed to tighten so far beyond the Fed's comfort level that if nothing else a rate cut might be equally as likely as the FDIC being allowed to increase its limit.
Ben Jeffery:
And along with that line of thinking is an idea that the three of us have discussed, which is the unknowable uncertainty of how many rate hikes is a regional banking crisis worth. And along with CPI and the refunding auctions next week, we also get to see the Senior Loan Officer Survey that is released on Monday.
Ian Lyngen:
To you two, everyone is a senior citizen.
Ben Jeffery:
But in all seriousness, the Senior Loan Officer Survey is one of the benchmark quantitative measures we're going to get in terms of how lenders around the country are pulling back on credit at a time when firms arguably are going to need increased access to capital given the state of the overall economic outlook.
Ian Lyngen:
It's also notable that the recent re-escalation of tensions in the banking sector put Monday's report in a very particular context, i.e., if we don't see credit standards being reflected as tighter, the market will simply look at that information as dated because it doesn't have the most recent leg of the saga. On the flip side, if loan officers indicate a great deal of tightening, the market will similarly say, "Well, that doesn't fully reflect what has happened and presumably what will happen over the course of the next couple of months."
Ben Jeffery:
And we had several discussions around this issue with a variety of types of clients this week, and the very good point was made around the role that regional banks play in terms of the overall lending landscape. Specifically given what might be ongoing consolidation in the financial space, that the variety of loans that regional banks give to presumably smaller local businesses may not carry over on a one-for-one basis to larger financial institutions.
Vail Hartman:
But a serious question, if you have your money at a smaller bank, why not move it to a larger one?
Ian Lyngen:
That's actually a very interesting notion and to some extent, we have seen outflows from small and regional banks into the big money center institutions. However, and as Ben pointed out, access to funding for small and medium-sized firms is a key service that is provided by the regional banks. And for all intents and purposes, it's the relationships between the small banks and the end user that have resulted in at least some of the deposits being comparatively sticky. Certainly, there's more loyalty on the part of depositors at small banks than there might be between large institutions, if that makes sense.
Ben Jeffery:
So this line of thinking should theoretically put a floor under the scale of deposit flight we'll see from smaller banks, but through a longer term and more macro lens, that's not going to prevent credit tightening from flowing through to actual business activity in terms of hiring plans. And it's that delayed flow through to ultimately the lagging indicator of the jobs market that's going to ultimately inspire a more dovish tone shift from the Fed. Although clearly in April with a 3.4% unemployment rate and an unchanged labor force participation rate that didn't happen last month.
Ian Lyngen:
We also haven't addressed the portfolio side of the regional banking sector. We know that even if it is in the held-to-maturity accounts, the sharp spike in interest rates over the course of the last 8 to 12 months has served to undermine some of the key assets. And frankly, that's why the banking sector finds itself in its current situation. Now, this isn't to suggest the global monetary policymakers are to blame, but rather it's simply a side effect of what the Fed has attempted to accomplish over the course of the last year and a half.
Vail Hartman:
So we've talked about the Fed and NFP and we also got the quarterly refunding announcement and what we're expecting will be the final unchanged coupon auction sizes.
Ben Jeffery:
You're exactly right, Vail. Wednesday morning we learned that next week's refunding auctions are going to be 35 billion 10s, 21 billion 30s, and 40 billion 3s to kick off May's coupon supply on Tuesday. But what investors were more focused on going into the release was any additional information that the Treasury Department was willing to give on the issue of Treasury buybacks, both for cash management purposes but also for liquidity support in the longer end of the curve. And what we saw was somewhat surprising on two fronts. First, we did get a fair amount of information on what it is the buyback program is actually going to look like. That was a surprise simply given the fact that the Treasury acknowledged they're going to need to continue to study this topic and get feedback from market participants, and then on the other side was the timing. While there were some that were expecting the program would be implemented as soon as August, what we actually learned is that we're going to need to wait until early next year until the initially relatively modest-size buyback program gets underway.
In terms of mechanics and size, what we saw was that for the Liquidity Support Program, the Treasury is endeavoring to purchase up to between 5 and $10 billion a month in maturities greater than one year, that will be spread in a distribution across the curve reflective of the current maturity profile of debt outstanding, similar to what we saw take place during QE. In terms of the cadence of the buying, somewhere between six and eight operations per quarter was suggested as a way to deliver one or two operations in each maturity bucket with the size and timing of the operations likely announced once a quarter, presumably at subsequent refunding announcements. So February, May, August, and November.
Ian Lyngen:
This actually brings us to a couple of issues as it relates to the Treasury Department's new buyback program. The first being how much will actually be utilized. Will we get to that 10 billion a month number and stay there or as we suspect, utilization will be high in the very beginning and as the program runs its course and continues to be a background factor, participation will slowly decline as the market re-prices to the reality of the Treasury's buyback program being in place for an extended period of time?
The second observation that we'd like to make is that the timing of the implementation of the program was very strategic. The Treasury Department is currently dealing with the debt ceiling issue, which means for all intents and purposes, the rundown of the TGA is creating a QE impulse at the moment where the Fed is actively engaged in QT. Fast-forward to the beginning of 2024, presumably the debt ceiling will be resolved and the QT that had been held at bay will be far more tangible in the real economy. And while the Fed's buybacks are neither QT nor QE, the reality is the net effect of the liquidity-enhancing effort will be a government buyer in the Treasury market. Which brings me to a question for you Vail. What is the difference between a bond and a bond trader?
Vail Hartman:
I don't know.
Ian Lyngen:
Bonds mature.
In the week ahead, U.S. Rates will be influenced by supply, inflation, inflation expectations, and of course any developments in the regional banking saga. Up first will be the 3-year auction of 40 billion on Tuesday, followed by 10s on Wednesday, and capped by 21 billion 30-years on Thursday. On Wednesday morning, the April CPI print is expected to come in at four tenths of a percent month over month with the core numbers at three tenths of a percent month over month. Given the recent volatility and some of the fluctuations within the used auto prices as well as the stickiness of OER and rent, despite the March numbers, there appears to be a modest bias toward an upside surprise within that series. It also warrants a nod to the fact that average hourly earnings in April did increase more than expected, about half a percent. And the correlation between average hourly earnings and core services ex-shelter is very high and represents the most direct pass-through that could lead to a wage inflation spiral of the type that the Fed has tried very hard to push back against over the course of this cycle.
Let us not forget that on Friday we get the University of Michigan's survey and this information is for May and contains the forward-looking inflation expectations number. Recall that the most recent print showed an upside surprise in one-year inflation expectations. Keep in mind that there's a high correlation between gasoline prices and short-term inflation expectations. So given some of the moves that we have seen in the energy sector, that shift was not particularly surprising. More importantly, the 5 to 10-year expectations remain at 2.9%, that's elevated by pre-pandemic standards and as a result, will remain an ongoing concern for monetary policymakers. While we are not expecting a near-term retracement of inflation back to the levels that the Fed would view as consistent with their longer-term objective, eventually the year-over-year base effects combined with a moderation in that monthly gains will lead the Fed to a position in which it chooses to emphasize forward-looking inflation expectations over the realized data in the event that the realized data finally conforms with a 2% inflation target.
The regional banking issues and concerns that the contagion could spread further have and will probably continue to influence the Treasury market and keep rates lower than they might have otherwise been. 3.65 in 2-year yields prove to be a good selling opportunity. And in the event of a retest of that range, we would similarly expect a bounce in front end nominal rates as such pricing implies a near-term Fed cut that we struggle to imagine comes to fruition. Looking further out the curve, we continue to view 3.50 in 10-year yields as an important focal point. And while we might see 10-year rates drift above 3.50 as indicated by the technical profile at the moment, anything above that 3.60 to 3.65 zone would represent a solid buying opportunity given the mounting array of global economic headwinds.
We've reached the point in this week's episode where we'd like to offer our sincere thanks and condolences to anyone who has managed to make it this far. And as we break down the details of the employment report, we'll note that April represented the 13th consecutive upside surprise. Not so unlucky after all, unless you were long Treasuries.
Thanks for listening to Macro Horizons. Please visit us at bmocm.com\macrohorizons. As we aspire to keep our strategy effort as interactive as possible, we'd love to hear what you thought of today's episode, so please email me directly with any feedback at Ian.Lyngen@bmo.com. You can listen to this show and subscribe on Apple Podcasts or your favorite podcast provider. This show and resources are supported by our team here at BMO, including the FICC Macro Strategy Group and BMO's marketing team. This show has been produced and edited by Puddle Creative.
Speaker 4:
The views expressed here are those of the participants and not those of BMO Capital Markets, its affiliates, or subsidiaries. For full legal disclosure, visit bmocm.com/macrohorizons/legal.
Autre contenu intéressant
Building for Tomorrow: Real Estate, Construction, and Sustainability
L’aspect économique de l’élimination du carbone : un entretien avec Deep Sky
Bonnie Hammer : Les femmes en affaires devraient chercher des mentors « durs à cuire ».
Comment les entreprises peuvent s’y retrouver dans le cadre de la politique climatique du Canada
Darryl White et Ian Bremmer parlent de l’importance de la relation canado-américaine
De grands leaders sont réunis pour parler de l’avantage nord-américain au Sommet Canada–États-Unis
Comment le secteur du capital-investissement s’adapte à l’évolution de la dynamique du marché
Le partenariat États-Unis-Canada: perspectives économiques en Amérique du Nord
The Globe and Mail : Pour le Canada et ses relations commerciales avec les États-Unis, la complaisance est synonyme de somnambulisme
Le secteur du capital-investissement trouve du réconfort dans l’incertitude qui règne dans le secteur de l’agroalimentaire
L’industrie vinicole américaine a des raisons de faire preuve d’un optimisme prudent
Propos de hauts dirigeants sur l’avenir de l’agroalimentaire
Une première dans l'Ouest canadien : Avenue Living tire parti du programme d'amélioration écoénergétique de BMO pour ajouter 179 nouveaux logements locatifs dans le centre-ville d'Edmonton
Le sommet inaugural de BMO sur l’obésité est axé sur les thérapies et la lutte contre une épidémie croissante
Le coût des plans d’action des entreprises en matière de climat
Risque climatique : changements réglementaires à surveiller en 2024
Comment la NASA et IBM utilisent les données géospatiales et l’intelligence artificielle pour analyser les risques climatiques
L’obligation de publier de l’information sur les facteurs ESG est le signe d’un marché arrivé à maturité
BMO organise un financement vert pour financer le nouveau Lawson Centre for Sustainability, la construction la plus importante de Trinity College depuis un siècle
BMO se classe parmi les sociétés les plus durables d'Amérique du Nord selon les indices de durabilité Dow Jones
Le Canada a l’occasion de devenir un chef de file mondial de l’élimination du dioxyde de carbone
Selon un sondage réalisé par l'Institut pour le climat de BMO auprès des chefs d'entreprise, près de la moitié des chefs d'entreprise des États-Unis et du Canada croient que les changements climatique
Un plus grand nombre d’entreprises ont des plans pour lutter contre les changements climatiques en raison de l’importance croissante qu’ils revêtent sur leurs activités : Résultats du sondage
L’électrification constitue une occasion unique dans le cadre de la transition énergétique
Questions et réponses : comment transformer les défis économiques en possibilités
Le soutien du secteur de l’énergie dans l’atteinte des objectifs de décarbonisation du Canada
Trois idées inspirées de la Semaine du climat pour passer à l’action à la COP28
Pourquoi les entreprises doivent accélérer leurs efforts pour lutter contre les changements climatiques
Du caractère essentiel du financement pour doper les technologies d’élimination du carbone
Transformer le système alimentaire mondial au bénéfice des investisseurs et de la planète
Banco do Brasil and BMO Financial Group to Introduce First-of-its-Kind Program to Provide Sustainability-Linked Trade Loans Supporting Brazilian Exporters
BMO Donates $3 Million to GRID Alternatives to Provide Solar Energy Solutions for Low-Income Families
Comment les investissements dans le captage du carbone peuvent générer des crédits carbone
BMO fournit un nouveau produit innovant, le dépôt lié à la durabilité, à Zurn Elkay Water Solutions
Quick Listen: Michael Torrance on Empowering Your Organization to Operationalize Sustainability
BMO seule grande banque nommée au palmarès des 50 meilleures entreprises citoyennes au Canada
Un investissement rentable : la rénovation comme moyen d’atteindre la carboneutralité
Évolution du marché du carbone : ce qu’en pensent les principaux acteurs
BMO et Bell Canada mettent en œuvre un produit dérivé innovant lié à la durabilité et à des objectifs ambitieux de réduction des émissions de gaz à effet de serre
Réduction du gaspillage alimentaire : solutions, occasions et retombées
J’attends avec impatience notre 18e Conférence annuelle sur les marchés agricoles
BMO fait partie d'un groupe convoqué par l'ONU qui conseille les banques mondiales sur l'établissement d'objectifs liés à la nature
Les chefs de file de l’investissement intensifient leurs efforts en vue d’atteindre l’objectif net zéro
Favoriser les innovations technologiques pour renforcer la résilience face aux changements climatiques
BMO célèbre le Jour de la Terre avec la 3e édition annuelle du programme Des transactions qui font pousser des arbres dans ses salles des marchés mondiaux
BMO Donates $2 Million to the University of Saskatchewan to Accelerate Research Critical to the Future of Food
L’infrastructure est la clé d’un marché compétitif en Amérique du Nord – Sommet États-Unis–Canada
Le temps presse pour les solutions au changement climatique - Sommet Canada-États-Unis
North America’s Critical Minerals Advantage: Deep Dive on Community Engagement
Réchauffement climatique : le GIEC lance son dernier avertissement de la décennie
Les légendes du roc réfléchissent aux réussites et aux échecs de l’industrie minière lors de la Conférence mondiale sur les mines, métaux et minéraux critiques
Exploration des avantages de l’extraction de minéraux critiques en Amérique du Nord dans le cadre de la Conférence mondiale sur les mines, métaux et minéraux critiques
La confiance est la denrée la plus précieuse : Message de l’ICMM à la Conférence mondiale sur les mines, métaux et minéraux critiques de BMO
Explorer les risques et les possibilités associés aux notations ESG dans le secteur minier
BMO Experts at our 32nd Global Metals, Mining & Critical Minerals Conference
Evolving Mining for a Sustainable Energy Transition: ICMM CEO Rohitesh Dhawan in Conversation
BMO Equity Research on BMO Radicle and the World of Carbon Credits
BMO tiendra sa 32e conférence mondiale sur le secteur des mines, des métaux et des minéraux essentiels
Public Policy and the Energy Transition: Howard Learner in Conversation
Taskforce on Nature-Related Financial Disclosure (TNFD) – A Plan for Integrating Nature into Business
Points à retenir du sondage sur le climat des petites et moyennes entreprises réalisé par l’Institut pour le climat de BMO
BMO nommée banque la plus durable d'Amérique du Nord par Corporate Knights pour la quatrième année d'affilée
Le financement vert du nucléaire : nouvelle frontière de la transition énergétique?
Assurer l’avenir des approvisionnements alimentaires : le rôle de l’Amérique du Nord
BMO s'est classé parmi les entreprises les plus durables en Amérique du Nord selon les indices de durabilité Dow Jones
Un sondage de l'Institut pour le climat de BMO révèle que les coûts et les priorités concurrentes ralentissent l'action climatique des petites et moyennes entreprises
Gérer et monétiser votre transition vers un monde carboneutre avec BMO et Radicle
BMO est l'institution financière la mieux classée selon le Global Sustainability Benchmark, le nouvel indice de référence mondial du développement durable annoncé lors de la COP 27
COP27 : Les problèmes de sécurité énergétique et l’incertitude économique ralentiront-t-ils la transition climatique?
BMO investira dans les crédits compensatoires de carbone novateurs de CarbonCure pour stocker du CO₂ de façon permanente
Financement commercial : vers le développement durable, une entreprise à la fois
RoadMap Project: An Indigenous-led Paradigm Shift for Economic Reconciliation
Une première canadienne : BMO et l'Université Concordia s'unissent pour un avenir durable grâce à un prêt innovant lié à la durabilité
Intégration des facteurs ESG dans les petites et moyennes entreprises : Conférence de Montréal
BMO entend racheter Radicle Group Inc., un chef de file des services environnementaux situé à Calgary
Investment Opportunities for a Net-Zero Economy: A Conversation at the Milken Institute Global Conference
S’ajuster face aux changements climatiques : l’Institut pour le climat de BMO
How Hope, Grit, and a Hospital Network Saved Maverix Private Capital Founder John Ruffolo
Hydrogen’s Role in the Energy Transition: Matt Fairley in Conversation
Key Takeaways on Ag, Food, Fertilizer & ESG from BMO’s Farm to Market Conference
Les risques physiques et liés à la transition auxquels font face l’alimentation et l’agriculture
Agriculture de pointe : réduire les impacts environnementaux en même temps que les coûts
Building an ESG Business Case in the Food Sector: The Food Institute
J’attends avec impatience notre 17e Conférence annuelle sur les marchés agricoles
Les prix des métaux encore loin d’une nouvelle normalité : Table ronde de BMO sur les mines
Aller de l’avant en matière de transition énergétique : Darryl White s’adresse aux gestionnaires de réserves et d’actifs mondiaux
BMO et EDC annoncent une collaboration pour présenter des solutions de financement durable aux entreprises canadiennes
Refonte au Canada pour un monde carboneutre : Conversation avec Corey Diamond d’Efficacité énergétique Canada
The Role of Hydrogen in the Energy Transition: FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few in Conversation
BMO est fier de soutenir la première transaction d'obligations vertes du gouvernement du Canada en tant que cochef de file
Article d’opinion: Le Canada peut être un leader en matière de sécurité énergétique
Les mesures prises par le gouvernement peuvent contribuer à stimuler la construction domiciliaire afin de remédier à la pénurie de logements au Canada
Tackling Climate Change in Metals and Mining: ICMM CEO Rohitesh Dhawan in Conversation
La circulaire de sollicitation de procurations et les rapports sur la durabilité 2021 de BMO sont maintenant disponibles
Why Changing Behaviour is Key to a Low Carbon Future – Dan Barclay
BMO lance le programme Services aux entreprises à portée de main - BMO pour les entrepreneurs noirs et annonce un engagement de 100 millions de dollars en prêts pour aider les entrepreneurs noirs à dé
The Post 2020 Biodiversity Framework – A Discussion with Basile Van Havre
BMO annonce son intention de se joindre au programme Catalyst de Breakthrough Energy pour accélérer l'innovation climatique
BMO Groupe financier nommé banque la plus durable en Amérique du Nord pour la troisième année d'affilée
Using Geospatial Big Data for Climate, Finance and Sustainability
Atténuer les répercussions des changements climatiques sur les actifs physiques par la finance spatiale
BMO aide Boralex à aller Au-delà des énergies renouvelables en transformant sa facilité de crédit en un prêt lié au développement durable
Première mondiale : BMO soutient Bruce Power avec le premier cadre de financement vert du secteur nucléaire au monde
BMO se classe parmi les entreprises les plus durables au monde, selon les indices de durabilité Dow Jones
COP26 : Pourquoi les entreprises doivent assumer leur responsabilité sociale
The Future of Remote Work and Diversity in the Asset Management Industry
Changer les comportements est essentiel pour assurer un avenir à faible émission de carbone – Table ronde Milken
BMO aide Teck Resources à progresser vers ses objectifs ESG avec un prêt lié à la durabilité
Première dans le secteur des métaux et des mines en Amérique du Nord : BMO aide Sandstorm Gold Royalties à atteindre ses objectifs ESG grâce à un prêt lié à la durabilité
Éducation, emploi et autonomie économique : BMO publie Wîcihitowin ᐑᒋᐦᐃᑐᐏᐣ, son premier Rapport sur les partenariats et les progrès en matière autochtone annuel
BMO annonce un engagement de financement de 12 milliards de dollars pour le logement abordable au Canada
In support of Canada’s bid to host the headquarters of the International Sustainability Standards Board
Investing in Real Estate Sustainability with Bright Power Inc.
BMO appuie la candidature du Canada pour accueillir le siège du Conseil des normes internationales d'information sur la durabilité
BMO nommé au classement des 50 meilleures entreprises citoyennes au Canada de Corporate Knights
ESG From Farm to Fork: Doing Well by Doing Good
Banques centrales, changements climatiques et leadership : Forum annuel destiné aux femmes œuvrant dans le secteur des titres à revenu fixe, devises et produits de base
BMO met sur pied une nouvelle équipe innovatrice pour la transition énergétique
L’appétit croissant pour l’investissement dans un but précis dans les valeurs à revenu fixe par Magali Gable
BMO organise le congrès annuel mondial sur les marchés agricoles pour une 16e année consécutive
Première nord-américaine : BMO aide Gibson Energy à transformer entièrement une facilité de crédit en un prêt lié à la durabilité
Le programme Des transactions qui font pousser des arbres permettra d’en planter 100 000
Les arbres issus des métiers bénéficient d'un marché obligataire ESG solide
Understanding Biodiversity Management: Best Practices and Innovation
The Changing Face of Sustainability: tentree for a Greener Planet
La 30e conférence mondiale annuelle sur le secteur des mines et des métaux de BMO est en cours
Favoriser des résultats durables : le premier prêt vert offert au Canada
Episode 29: What 20 Years of ESG Engagement Can Teach Us About the Future
Rapport sur les perspectives de 2021 de BMO Gestion mondiale d'actifs : des jours meilleurs à venir
Episode 28: Bloomberg: Enhancing ESG Disclosure through Data-Driven Solutions
Comment Repérer L’écoblanchiment Et Trouver Un Partenaire Qui Vous Convient
BMO se classe parmi les entreprises les plus durables selon l'indice de durabilité Dow Jones - Amérique du Nord
Episode 27: Preventing The Antimicrobial Resistance Health Crisis
BMO investit dans un avenir durable grâce à un don d’un million de dollars à l’Institute for Sustainable Finance
BMO Groupe financier franchit une étape clé en faisant correspondre 100 pour cent de sa consommation d'électricité avec des énergies renouvelables
BMO Groupe financier reconnu comme l'une des sociétés les mieux gérées de manière durable au monde dans le nouveau classement du Wall Street Journal
Episode 23: TC Transcontinental – A Market Leader in Sustainable Packaging
Les possibilités de placement durables dans le monde d’après la pandémie
BMO Capital Markets to host 2020 Prescriptions for Success Healthcare Virtual Conference
Les sociétés axées sur l’efficacité énergétique peuvent maintenant réduire leurs coûts d’emprunt
BMO Groupe financier s'approvisionnera à 100 pour cent en électricité à partir d'énergies renouvelables
Episode 13: Faire face à la COVID-19 en optant pour des solutions financières durables
Épisode 09 : Le pouvoir de la collaboration en matière d'investissement ESG
Épisode 08 : La tarification des risques climatiques, avec Bob Litterman
Épisode 07 : Mobiliser les marchés des capitaux en faveur d’une finance durable
Épisode 06 : L’investissement responsable – Tendances et pratiques exemplaires canadiennes
Épisode 04 : Divulgation de renseignements relatifs à la durabilité : Utiliser le modèle de SASB
Épisode 03 : Taxonomie verte: le plan d'action pour un financement durable de l'UE
Épisode 02 : Analyser les risques climatiques pour les marchés financiers